EligibleTrials

Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy Performed by Robot-assisted Laparoscopy or Conventional Laparoscopy or by Laparotomy

Recruiting · NCT04638088 · Observational (researchers observe without assigning treatment) · Lead sponsor: Elsan

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Prostate Cancer

Interventions studied

assessment of urinary function and erectil function before and after prostatectomy

What this trial is about

Minimally invasive surgery has developed widely since the 1980s and has revolutionized the practices of surgeons. In urology, the development of laparoscopy and then robot-assisted surgery has considerably improved the management of pathologies. In France, as in all the countries concerned, the spread of robotic surgery has taken place without prior studies validating this new technology, nor organizational rules in terms of quality and access to care. The report of the Haute Autorité de Santé dated November 2016 underlines the weakness of the methodological quality of studies and meta-analyzes evaluating robot-assisted total prostatectomy compared to other surgical techniques by laparotomy or conventional laparoscopy. It therefore appears important to evaluate in a large study the interest of this technique in order to help the authorities to decide on the real benefit of this technology and to provide reliable answers to the patients.

Who can take part

Age range
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
Healthy volunteers
No - a diagnosis or condition is required
Phase
Not specified
Study type
Observational (researchers observe without assigning treatment)

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Where it is running

30 locations listed.

Read the full protocol, contacts and eligibility on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Get notified when new trials open

One email when new recruiting trials are added. Unsubscribe anytime.