EligibleTrials

Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer

Recruiting · NCT05943444 · Interventional (participants receive a specific treatment) · Lead sponsor: Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Colorectal cancer

Interventions studied

Bacon techniqueParks technique

What this trial is about

The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.

Who can take part

Age range
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All (male and female)
Healthy volunteers
No - a diagnosis or condition is required
Phase
Not applicable (e.g. observational or device study)
Study type
Interventional (participants receive a specific treatment)

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Where it is running

1 location listed.

Read the full protocol, contacts and eligibility on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Get notified when new trials open

One email when new recruiting trials are added. Unsubscribe anytime.