EligibleTrials

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Acetazolamide Versus Metolazone as an Adjunct to Standard Therapy in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Recruiting · NCT07199088 · Interventional (participants receive a specific treatment) · Lead sponsor: University of Health Sciences Lahore

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Heart failure

Interventions studied

AcetazolamideMetolazone

What this trial is about

This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of acetazolamide versus metolazone as adjunctive treatments to standard therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). ADHF is a life-threatening condition, and current treatments often involve loop diuretics to alleviate volume overload. This study will assess the added benefit of acetazolamide and metolazone in improving decongestion, reducing hospital stays, and preventing complications such as renal dysfunction or electrolyte imbalances. Participants will be randomized to receive either acetazolamide or metolazone in addition to standard diuretic therapy. The trial will evaluate primary outcomes including successful decongestion, in-hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay, with secondary outcomes focusing on renal function, electrolyte disturbances, and overall safety. The study is conducted at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, and aims to provide valuable insights into the management of ADHF, especially in the Pakistani population.

Who can take part

Age range
18 Years and older
Sex
All (male and female)
Healthy volunteers
No - a diagnosis or condition is required
Phase
Not applicable (e.g. observational or device study)
Study type
Interventional (participants receive a specific treatment)

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Where it is running

1 location listed.

Read the full protocol, contacts and eligibility on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Get notified when new trials open

One email when new recruiting trials are added. Unsubscribe anytime.